Helpful ReplyHot!Women you shouldn't but you would

Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 2 of 25
Author
RAYZA
  • Total Posts : 90006
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 22:47:04 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: djredshift

So assuming I started having sex with all the people i wanted to have sex with right now, like 3 people a day, 365 days a year, for 30 years, that's only 32850. That's only 5% of the population of denver. Fucking denver people, if I fucked all I could fuck I could only plow through 5% of denver. Some of those people are going to be gross by the time I get to them too. So fuck, there's no point in even trying. At the maximum human sexual potential a human being could only fuck 5% of denver. Meh.


So assuming i launched the most vicious headbutt into your temple you'd spaz out then die in the most pathetic manner right?

Sorry was just day dreaming there. Shut up cunt.
#31
djredshift
  • Total Posts : 237
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 22:50:19 (permalink)
You ain't shit tho razor. At your maximum human potential you could still only have sex with 5% of denver.
#32
Mod X
  • Total Posts : 26845
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 22:53:11 (permalink)
The fact that you even did that weird calculation says a lot.
#33
RAYZA
  • Total Posts : 90006
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 22:54:53 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: djredshift

You ain't shit tho razor. At your maximum human potential you could still only have sex with 5% of denver.


Did not read.

Also, shut up cunt.

PS, shut it prick.
#34
Daniel Snakeman
  • Total Posts : 31695
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 22:57:23 (permalink)
LOL @ Grace Jones
#35
djredshift
  • Total Posts : 237
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 22:58:55 (permalink)
Well the point is that if you compare the ratio of people horrid skanks have boned to people devout christians have boned, the difference is negligible when you apply that to a percentage of the world population you've had sex with. You can't call anyone a slut or even sexually experienced because no matter how hard they've tried or tried to not they have hardly put a dent in the population. Relatively speaking, nobody is on some slut/puritan scale. It's all negligible and statistically irrelevant.
#36
PapaJaro
  • Total Posts : 6594
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 23:01:59 (permalink)
I think that calculation says a lot about our limitations as men and as individuals tbh. Great thought for the day Redshift, very humbling.

You could conquer a town the size of Newbury in Berkshire if you really wanted to. That would include old and young though. And men.
#37
Nugz
  • Total Posts : 1442
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 23:02:10 (permalink)
knox doesnt belong in this thread, unless you mean you would be worried about her offing you
#38
PapaJaro
  • Total Posts : 6594
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 23:03:17 (permalink)
Depends how much you wanted it I guess.
#39
djredshift
  • Total Posts : 237
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 23:05:13 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: PapaJaro

I think that calculation says a lot about our limitations as men and as individuals tbh. Great thought for the day Redshift, very humbling.

You could conquer a town the size of Newbury in Berkshire if you really wanted to. That would include old and young though. And men.


wait so you know women that are good to go more than 3 times a day? [sm=smilie_disco1.gif]
#40
DLT
  • Total Posts : 153
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 23:05:52 (permalink)
Knox would get hate fucked into oblivion. No kissing.

edit: djredshift are you on copious amounts of mind-altering drugs? A simple yes or no would suffice, not some bizarre ramble about Denver/5%.
post edited by DLT - 2014/07/01 23:07:25
#41
Willfunk
  • Total Posts : 14662
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 23:07:50 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: Snakey

LOL @ Grace Jones


I lolled at this also. Take a hand full of those cheapo chocolate Matchsticks and throw them into a pile on the floor. Now take off your pants and undies and rub your dick up and down them. Move them about a bit.

That is what I imagine fucking Grace Jones would be like
#42
Miss SD
  • Total Posts : 24774
  • Status: online
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 23:12:15 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: willfunk

ORIGINAL: Snakey

LOL @ Grace Jones


I lolled at this also. Take a hand full of those cheapo chocolate Matchsticks and throw them into a pile on the floor. Now take off your pants and undies and rub your dick up and down them. Move them about a bit.

That is what I imagine fucking Grace Jones would be like

She'd probably bite your cock off in a rage too
#43
PapaJaro
  • Total Posts : 6594
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 23:18:04 (permalink)
She's 66, I think shagging her would be a MMTBM.
#44
RAYZA
  • Total Posts : 90006
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 23:18:24 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: Nugz

knox doesnt belong in this thread, unless you mean you would be worried about her offing you


I think it's probably safe to say you shouldn't really shag a mental murderer. Def WB tho.
#45
djredshift
  • Total Posts : 237
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 23:48:47 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: Razor

ORIGINAL: Nugz

knox doesnt belong in this thread, unless you mean you would be worried about her offing you


I think it's probably safe to say you shouldn't really shag a mental murderer. Def WB tho.



[sm=gay.gif] if you don't!
#46
Mod X
  • Total Posts : 26845
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/01 23:54:53 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: PapaJaro

She's 66 over 16, I think shagging her would be a MMTBM.


#47
Flow Joe
  • Total Posts : 1456
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/02 00:04:04 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: Miss SD

ORIGINAL: willfunk

ORIGINAL: Snakey

LOL @ Grace Jones


I lolled at this also. Take a hand full of those cheapo chocolate Matchsticks and throw them into a pile on the floor. Now take off your pants and undies and rub your dick up and down them. Move them about a bit.

That is what I imagine fucking Grace Jones would be like

She'd probably bite your cock off in a rage too


Haha, I don't find her attractive, although her body is super-human, even now.

It's the very fact you may not make it out alive that's the odd appeal.


#48
Mod X
  • Total Posts : 26845
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/02 00:09:31 (permalink)
If the saying that mental women are better in bed has any truth to it, you'd probably end up like some sort of spunk fountain.
#49
DLT
  • Total Posts : 153
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/02 00:11:53 (permalink)


She knows you're talking about her.
#50
PapaJaro
  • Total Posts : 6594
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/02 00:34:33 (permalink)
What's with her accent though?

Jewish american: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fY_hoj0dR4k

Posh english: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpWo15Jc2JQ
#51
SW14
  • Total Posts : 8861
  • Status: online
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/02 00:43:56 (permalink)
#52
Goodone
  • Total Posts : 4463
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/02 03:41:33 (permalink)


There I've said it
#53
Noc
  • Total Posts : 18802
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/02 07:56:49 (permalink)
#54
nayf
  • Total Posts : 3002
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/02 07:58:50 (permalink)
I concur with the last three
#55
LHC
  • Total Posts : 5803
  • Status: online
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/02 08:54:22 (permalink)
Yes the last 3 would get it. Josie would be pure hatefuck though. I never understood why Mutya was considered the ugly one. Asian = WB
#56
The Waco Kid
  • Total Posts : 43441
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/02 09:30:28 (permalink)
Rebekah Brooks
Whitney off Eastenders


#57
Daniel Snakeman
  • Total Posts : 31695
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/02 09:36:20 (permalink)
Brooks????
 



#58
Matty H
  • Total Posts : 3637
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/02 09:42:15 (permalink)
Sue barker
#59
Whagwan
  • Total Posts : 22328
  • Status: offline
RE: Women you shouldn't but you would 2014/07/02 09:52:56 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: Snakey

Brooks????




This x100
#60
Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 2 of 25
Jump to:
© 2017 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.0